Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Han and Greek Dbq Essay

The ancient societies of Greece and mainland china from each one produced a civilization remark subject for its time. Although these civilizations emerged virtually one thousand long time apart, their philosophies were only if different, had various forms of governing, and had unique economic classes. First, the thoughts of the legion(predicate) Greek philosophers were absolutely different from those of the Chinese philosophers. Chinese philosophers believed that the individual was not as important as the kingdom was as a whole, whereas Greek philosophers consider the individuals as a crucial part of society.As sh aver in schedule 12, the humans is minuscule to the landscape rough him, showing that the human is only a tiny rig in the civilization. The Greek Discus ceramicist portrayed in Document 11, is soulation the view that the individual is the main focalisation of the society in which one resides. These dickens enrolments display how Han China and Classical Gre ece be different in their philosophies. Classical Greece looks at an individual as a mainstay component in their daily life. Han China however does not look at an individual like the Greeks, but rather as a small theatrical role in the vast kingdom.Confucius believes that by creation a good person you argon taking part in the presidency because one does not bind espouse part in the government to be part of society, one must evidently do what is right (Document 10). Confucius believes this because he has his own ideals that be separate from the government and as long as people are doing the right thing they are a part of the government. There is no enter that portrays the take of a Greek philosopher hardly on where an individual stands in the Greek state.This would allow one to be merely the thoughts of a Greek philosopher and not only a Chinese philosopher. Second, the form of authorities displayed by the Chinese civilization change from that of the Greek civiliza tion. The Greek civilization had true a new form of government democracy that contrasted from the bureaucracy in Han China. As shown in Document 7, the Han dynasty stresses a unshakable central government with umpteen appointive governors to each district its dynasty possesses.However, the Athenian government was based on the people, so they essentially governed themselves (Document 5). Also displayed in Document 8, they expressive style the government is set up, anyone who has his own contrast has business in the government. That track if that person does not have any personal matters at all is not touch in the government. Although in Document 6, the way anyone is in government is chosen by the heavens. This directly relates to how these civilizations forms of governance are all different.Pericles believes that democracy is the best(p) government system because he displays an begin of ways in which the government is of the people, such(prenominal) as in settling of he ad-to-head disputes, everyone is equal before law (Document 4). The past Greece map in Document 1 displays an inaccurate proportion of size to the Han empire map that makes it seem that the Athenians controlled as oft territory as the Han, where in pragmatism they only controlled about a twelfth of the land that the Han did. There is no chronicle that portrays a Chinese philosopher that may have his life in danger for the ideas he has.This would allow the reader to know what a Chinese philosopher would think about his give in society if he was questioned in what he believes in (Document 9). Third, the Han and Greek civilizations displayed numerous and unique economic classes that were different from each other. The Chinese economic classes consisted of six divisions whereas the Athenian economic classes consisted of four divisions. As shown in Document 2, there were as galore(postnominal) withdraw male citizens as free male non-citizens and about as umteen free females as s laves.The population scattering of Han China portrayed in Document 3 shows that there were only a few appointed officials along with the emperor, around thirteen times more improve bureaucrats, ten times as many aristocracies as bureaucrats, around 58,500,000 farmers, only 50,000 merchants, and 5,000,000 smashed people. This shows how opposite the social classes of Classical Greece and Han Chin are. Aristotle believes that the class and job that a person has must keep that and try to turn around that of another because there will be no more distinction surrounded by the master and the slave.Aristotle believes this because he is a blue class citizen and he does not deficiency to change his class. There is no document that accurately portrays the feelings of a slave on class distinctions. This would allow one to know the desires that a slave would have and why it would be better if he were able to move up in society. In conclusion, the ancient civilizations of Han China and Gre ece each created a society influential to the time terminus it flourished in. Although these civilizations emerged nearly one thousand years apart, they had unique economic classes, had various forms of governance, and their philosophies were completely different.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.